The latest expansion is $50, while everything previously has been rolled into the subscription fee of $15 per month. If you want realism, if you want history, go visit a museum, read a textbook, but don't ask Battlefield to be your teacher.Įdit: World of Warcraft did not stop charging for expansions, in a sense. You read the Bhagavad-gt, and you are immediately in the battlefield of Kuruketra. What kinda crock is that? If anyone who plays BFV comes away thinking women actually did frontline combat in WWII, then they are dumb, or uneducated. Caitanya Mahaprabhu, the illiterate brahmana and the Bhagavad-gita. I've seen people say things like DICE is trying to change history. Games aren't supposed to be realistic anymore than we expect our movies, tv, books to be realistic. When people decry the lack of historical accuracy about women in combat, frankly my answer is "So what? Why does it matter?" Its a game. Hell, I regret getting the Premium for BF1. These are people who are uneducated they don’t understand that this is a plausible scenario, and listen: this is a game. Electronic Arts' Patrick Soderlund says the people lashing out against women in the new Battlefield trailer are uneducated. There were a ton of women who both fought in World War II and partook in the war. The common perception is that there were no women in World War II. I'm willing to see fake arms in return for saving $60 on the Premium Pass. Battlefield V is a lot about the unseen, the untold, the unplayed. When people complain about the cosmetics, I counter it with the fact that they wiped away the Premium Pass, and we will no longer have to deal with sub-par expansion maps, unbalanced and empty of player numbers.
So arguments about immersion, about realism, they fall flat on me. So I set aside my annoyance and I had a great time playing Battlefield 1. Then, I remember what people wrote about my complaints, and it was basically, "Battlefield has never been about realism, but fun" and frankly, remembering BF2 and BF1942, I had to admit that was completely true. I was annoyed about all the SMGs, the running around, and general lack of realism vs how the war was actually fought. I find the arguments about it the same as the position I had when BF1 came out concerning the nature of WWI guns and warfare. Tbh, I thought about it, I'm okay with including women as player avatars in the multiplayer. Unfortunately, their marketing and messaging messed up, and irked lots of people.
That is their plan with Battlefield 5 (at least for maps).
0 kommentar(er)
